February 28th - March 25th
2001
Prelude:
Merce Cunningham's
father delights - John Cage from ``Indeterminacy: new aspect of form in instrumental
and electronic Big shots and burn out
As an art, photography in all it's century of progressing glory is all of a
sudden to a gaseous free-fall. It holds much the same position, has many of
the same problems, as painting did about 50 years ago. It is ubiquitous, overwrought,
and generally reaching critical mass in the cliche department.
Both Warhol and Raushenberg used photography, through screenprints, to reinvigorate
that fifties problem in painting. Then conceptualists as varied as John Baldissari
and Sol Lewitt(etc. etc.) lugged it through the muck in new, fun and subversive
ways. Photography rose to full power in the late seventies and early eighties
as painting wheezed out its last expressive gasps. Leading the triumphant photography
brigade were Cindy Sherman (faux-cinematic fables) and Robert Maplethorpe (velveteen
transgression). Since then, the medium has spread like wildfire and now
the fire is mushrooming atomic, 'tis this digital age.
Maplethorpe died the tragic death befitting his myth. Sherman is
still cranking out the work from her neofeminist prop shop, and
now she's joined by the blurry lexicon school, the snapshot
esthetic, the voyeuristic memoir. The famed ex-victim Nan Goldin
emerges victorious relapsing at appropriate intervals, while the
"is it real or is it not" diorama is so "in" it is over.
At the other end of the esthetic spectrum is photo rococo,
staged and art-directed to the hilt. Art stud Matthew Barney
orchestrates lush, over-the-top, hyper-sugar-rush tableaux that
accompany and enhance his "art" film productions.
Which evolved from and leads back to MTV.
MTV provides the most spectacular of all photo stills. Stealing
from one and all (especially the works of contemporary
photography), young filmmakers cut and jump like orgiastic
chimps on a meth binge, with isolated images leaping around in
deliberate ultra Mac synched behemoth chaos. Form has utterly
replaced content.
The once humble and intimate photograph is endangered in these rittlin' rattled
A.D.D. days.
Neo-geography lesson
Dianne Jones is a young photographer from the West Coast
who spent a big chunk of last year traveling around the country
via Amtrak, seeing the USA (instead of flying over it). She also
scouted places to exhibit her work.
Baltimore's H. Lewis Gallery was one she marked on her list, and when she sent
slides, they responded. Finally, some willingness from a smallish gallery to
bring in unknown talent from the other side of the continent. Enough regional
squabbles already. Time to go at least coastal and; I hope global. If all these
weedy ragtag bands can do it, why not visual artists?
Jones makes a strong case that regionalism may be interesting,
but ultimately less important than strong individual vision intent.
A lesson often lost in this city of urban-envy, sunk in self-pity
about being ignored as the kid that's not as smart or successful
or pretty as its siblings, NY and DC (even Philly or Pittsburgh for
Gods sake). Jones also makes the case, much as the folkie
types of previous generations, that one small instrument
utilized with passion and precision can still yield sublime and
remarkable results in the face of the world machine.
Twin infinities
Jones handles the issues raised by the current photographic
debasement by, wisely, ignoring them. Avoiding MTV slickness or
Barney baroque or faux-documentary story-telling, she uses the
simple representative aspect of photography to create
resonance and echoes in the viewer. She's assembled 17 pairs
of images into quietly expressive diptychs.
Not so bit a deal linking two connecting or contrasting images
or fields is a common strategy in today's artworld, a nod
towards the complexities of cinema and narration. But Jones
work has a special quality, a quality that elevates it.
Unlike the gigantor bus-sized prints now infesting the cityscape (and galleries),
these works are relatively diminutive & shy; 12 by 24 inches or so. Everything
is gained from this intimate viewing. The scaling-down reflects the quieter,
homemade esthetic of the music the artist admires, and also the more introspective
contemplation the artist hopes the viewer will engage in.
Jones is meticulous in her selections and production. She
develops all her own prints, getting the clarity of color exact for
each one. The care she takes shows; the lines and colors of the
binary images intersect with a structuralist beauty that's never
contrived. The work escapes language as it wings into that
particular poetic space of communal otherness.
Indie terminancy
Jones says one of her main artistic influences is John Cage, the
man who used a heightened sense of the everyday to
transform a common symphonic experience into an orchestra of
smiles, snags and elegy. Cage's taste for the dignified
exaltation of quiet now mixed with a sense of wonder is clearly
present in Jones' current work.
Many think of John Cage's breakthrough mid-20th century style
as chaotic and utterly random. Actually, he used randomness
and chance to infuse his carefully structured work with a sense
of the natural. And Jones' work too, her careful choice and
organic engineering, is anything but random or chaotic. She
finds her artistic alliance within the values and ultimate
esthetics of Cage and his Westernized adoption of certain
tenets of Eastern philosophies.
Another, and probably more important, influence on Jones is
current independent music. Here the connection is direct, of her
time rather than the historic past, and thus the effects are in
constant flux. What music does she listen to? "Nothing that
would be on the radio" she says, smiling. She reels off a list of
favorite bands covered in the purist fringe indie rag Puncture,
and hardly anywhere else. She has a passion for this music,
knows the musicians, photographs them in San Francisco and is
well-versed in the culture's current folklore. This music isn't just
background music for her work; instead, she relates her process
directly to her colleagues' process. Jones shares the same
psychic arena.
Heavy pet sounds and structural engineering
Jones' photo diptychs work as short song compositions; much
like those produced by the bands she admires. Juxtaposed
'movements' produce new and fresh moments, both for the
artist and even more so for the viewer/listener. When writing a
song it is just this kind of clashing but similar situation that
creates the central spin and drama. The similarities create the
rhythm (structure) that binds it together, while the lyrics or
melody break it apart in weaving texture.
Almost as if underlining this connection, local twin guitar driven 'soundscape'
band Sonna and the venerable powerhouse of waltztime cinematic high wail Will
Oldham performed for an hour before Jones' opening. The two acts performed short
sets of approximately the same length, back to back, a parallel to the binary
images presented.
Like the best music, Jones' photographs are complex and
seductive without being overtly controlling. Her image of a vast
bowling ally next to a slick airport luggage line has obvious
structural and color/texture connections. Yet the pairing further
plays out other deep complex human textual narratives,
reflective and open to interpretation. Travel, games, movement,
interior open space and the lone dark suited figure waiting like
an actor in the wings of a schematic cultural stage.
There are no images of faces, no full frontal portraits, and only
this one body makes a stark appearance. Yet Jones manages to
portray a fully humanistic world with a wide breath. The very
absence of people enhances our thoughts of their role; our
role, in the world portrayed.
Grounded (live)
Many of this younger generation of artists and musicians seem
tired of proving how tough, smart or smart-ass they are.
Instead, they want to connect. Pop-culture irony has failed
them; they are ultra wise to its marketing and have moved
beyond its Disney/McDonalds clampdown. They instead choose
to lay low and keep some form of integrity through their work.
Bands like Neutral Milk Hotel and Olivia Tremor Control live
communally in Athens, Georgia, cross-pollinating and turning out
dense, lush albums that need numerous listens to decipher and
fully appreciate. These bands and artists like Jones finally fulfill
the early promise of the San Francisco commune esthetic of
;music/art making.
While talking to me, Jones made numerous unselfconscious
references to the spiritual nature of her work. It was very
refreshing and very real. Most of the time artists skitter away
from the word, as if uttering it was akin to admitting to having
some dreadful disease. And often when they do mention the
spiritual one fears the worst, sticks strung together in a
wooded section of some backlot park, or faux-naïve retablos by
hipsterish white boys just back from Mexico.
Not Jones. Within all her works the spirit of nature meets the
spirit of the artificial indoors. The modern world is treated with
equal awe as the leaf-strewn ground. The most effective of the
photograph pairs are the interior/exterior combines, linking the
rooms we occupy with the landscapes we plod. Never cliche,
Jones always manages to be subtle and surprising, exhibiting
an attitude that's not frightened or despairing, but instead
expresses a gentle reverence. The best example of this is the
Study Number 9. The rainy gray sky and powerlines allied with
the cornfields evoked an updated and more enriched less
alienated Robert Frank.
I'm happy to see young artists moving beyond their home
states, making their way and showing us their vision. We're
used to indie music gypsies traversing the country in worn
Econoline vans. Maybe we can look forward to the day when
groups of young visual artists hit the road in the same way. As
a local art community, we can go a long way towards making
space for them. H. Lewis Gallery is to be commended for
leading the way.
H. Lewis Gallery
1500 Bolton St.
Baltimore, MD 21217
410 462 4515
hlewis.com
Dichotomies
Study One Through Seventeen
by Jack Livingston
from peekreview.net
in gardening.
Each year
he has
had
to
move the
shrubs back
from
the driveway
to protect
them from
being run
over when
Mrs.
Cunningham
backs out.
One
day Mrs.
Cunningham
in
backing out
knocked
down but
did
not hurt
an
elderly gentleman
who
had
been taking
a
stroll.
Getting out
of
her
car and
seeing
him
lying on
the
sidewalk,
Mrs. Cunningham
said,
"What
are
you doing
there?"
music'', Silence, p.272
Two of a Kind The exhibit is made up of 34 color photographs, highlighted by rich, saturated
hues. Thirty-three of For the 17 numbered studies in the series, Jones mounted two nominally unrelated
photos together That said, some of the Dichotomies seem utterly inscrutable, others banal.
Some, such as "Study
Comparing and Contrasting Dichotomies at H. Lewis
By Lee Gardner
From the Baltimore
City Paper
It's force of habit to make connections between two art works hanging side by
side, even if the
artist(s) and curator intend no direct link. Rather than ignoring or working
against that impulse, San
Francisco-based photographer Dianne Jones exploits it--even tweaks it--in her
Dichotomies series,
now on display at the H. Lewis Gallery.
the photos present depopulated vistas both natural and man-made--from
a leafy grove of bamboo to a
bank of apartment-building mailboxes and a lone orange road cone caught by a
flash on a darkened
parking lot. (A faceless elderly couple leans over the side of a boat in the
34th photo.) The shots are
striking but not particularly remarkable on their own. But Dichotomies isn't
about the individual
shots.
within a single frame to react together in the viewer's eye and mind. The lamp-lit
flowered
wallpaper of the left-hand photo contrasts with the cooler, blurred photo of
a field of waving
wildflowers in "Dichotomies Study Seventeen." In "Study Three," the impossibly
dense and straight
bamboo stalks of the aforementioned grove jut through diffuse natural light,
only to be mirrored in
the flash-lit gleam of the machined steel grooves and teeth of escalator stairs
in the photo beside it.
Jones cites the influence of avant-garde composer John Cage and his theories
on the use of chance in
art, but most of the photo-duos that make up the studies seem very carefully
chosen to go together, even
to comment on each other.
One," which juxtaposes a shot of a fluorescent-lit, institutional-tan bowling
alley with a shot of a
fluorescent-lit, institutional-tan baggage pick-up belt, seem like mere formal
exercises. But that's one
of the nice things about Jones' Dichotomies--they please on a visual level,
then make you question
exactly what it is you see, or what you are meant to see. I circled the tiny
H. Lewis space a few times
before it occurred to me that what the dead leaves and the dinner entrée
splattered across a tile floor
in "Study Twelve" have in common is that they have both fallen. At first glance,
the juxtaposition
of the plush red theater seats in the bottom half of "Study Fifteen" and gloomy
seaside sunset in the
top half seemed obvious, even mundane. A closer look at the crushed velvet texture
on the backs of
the seats themselves led my eyes up to the fish-scale-like scud clouds deep
in the sunset sky. When I
began to realize that the rows of seats looked an awful lot like ranks of breakers
waiting to crash on
a beach, I revoked all assumptions about what Jones and her unassuming show
are all about.